Note

Diapsid Phylogeny

Michel Laurin and Jacques A. Gauthier

Even though diapsid phylogeny has been intensively studied, relatively few computer-assisted studies of early diapsids have been published. The large-scale phylogenetic analyses of Benton (1985), Evans (1988), and Gauthier et al. (1988) focused on lepidosauromorphs and archosauromorphs. More recently, phylogenies based on data matrices incorporating several diapsid terminal taxa (more than 20) were presented. Therefore, only simplified versions of these phylogenies are presented here (the node names are modified to be consistent with the recommended usage and do not necessarily follow the published versions).

This page deals mostly with the phylogeny between the various stem-diapsids, Lepidosauromorpha and Archosauromorpha. However, some taxa, such as ichthyosaurs and sauropterygians, have been variously thought to be stem-diapsids, lepidosauromorphs, or archosauromorphs, so their affinities are briefly discussed below. Turtles are usually not considered diapsids, but a few paleontological studies have suggested that they were closely related to sauropterygians (and to lepidosauromorphs). The results of these studies are also briefly exposed below.

Benton (1985) presented the following phylogeny:

     ===================================== Araeoscelidia 
     |
     |                                 === Younginiformes 
=====|             ==Lepidosauromorpha=|
     ==Neodiapsida=|                   === Lepidosauria 
                   |
                   ======================= Archosauromorpha 

Evans (1988) studied more stem-diapsids, but her main conclusions are similar to those of Benton (1985) and Gauthier et al. (1988):

     ============================================ Araeoscelidia 
     |
     |  ========================================= Coelurosauravus 
     |  |
     |  |  ====================================== Sauropterygia 
     |  |  |
     |  |  |===================================== Heleosaurus 
     |  |  |
=====|  |  |===================================== Galesphyrus 
     ===|  |
        ===|                                  === Heleosuchus 
           |                               ===|
           |           ==Lepidosauromorpha=|  === Younginiformes 
           ====Sauria==|                   |
                       |                   ====== Lepidosauria 
                       |
                       ========================== Archosauromorpha 

Both of these studies, as well as Gauthier et al. (1988) suggested that younginiforms were lepidosauromorphs. Laurin (1991) argued that younginiforms were not saurians, and this conclusion has been accepted by most scientists (Rieppel, 1993, 1994; Gauthier, 1994). The phylogeny suggested by Laurin (1991) is as follows:

     ================================ Araeoscelidia 
     |
     |             ================== Coelurosauravus 
     |             |
     |             |  =============== Apsisaurus 
=====|             |  |
     ==Neodiapsida=|  |  ============ Younginiformes 
                   ===|  |
                      ===|        === Lepidosauromorpha 
                         ==Sauria=|
                                  === Archosauromorpha 

Rieppel (1994), Rieppel and deBraga (1996), and deBraga and Rieppel (1997) argued that turtles (Testudines) are closely related to sauropterygians (a group of aquatic diapsids from the Mesozoic), and that both groups are lepidosauromorphs. This phylogeny suggests that turtles are actually diapsids that have lost their temporal fenestrae. While this conclusion remains controversial, it deserves to be presented:

    ==================================================== Araeoscelidia 
    |
    |             ====================================== Claudiosaurus 
    |             |
    |             |  =================================== Younginiformes 
    |             |  |
====|             |  |                               === Sauropterygia 
    ==Neodiapsida=|  |                            ===|
                  ===|        ==Lepidosauromorpha=|  === Testudines 
                     ==Sauria=|                   |
                              |                   ====== Lepidosauria 
                              |
                              ========================== Archosauromorpha

Gauthier (1994) reviewed amniote phylogeny.

Caldwell (1996) did one of the first computer-assisted phylogenetic analyses of diapsids incorporating ichthyosaurs. He found that if turtles and ichthyosaurs were included in his matrix, ichthyosaurs were the sister-group of sauropterygians, and this large clade of aquatic diapsids was close to the base of Archosauromorpha, while turtles appeared to be lepidosauromorphs.

     ======================== Araeoscelidia 
     |
=====|  ===================== Claudiosaurus
     |  |
     ===|  ================== Younginiformes
        |  |
        ===|           ====== Lepidosauria 
           |        ===|
           |        |  ====== Testudines
           ==Sauria=|
                    |     === Sauropterygia
                    |  ===|
                    ===|  === Ichthyosauria
                       |
                       ====== Archosauria 

Without ichthyosaurs, the same matrix resulted in a topology in which turtles were the sister-group of sauropterygians, and in which this clade was part of Lepidosauromorpha (sauropterygians shifted from archosauromorphs to lepidosauromorphs).

     ======================== Araeoscelidia
     |
=====|  ===================== Claudiosaurus 
     |  |
     ===|  ================== Younginiformes
        |  |
        ===|           ====== Lepidosauria
           |        ===|
           |        |  |  === Sauropterygia  
           ==Sauria=|  ===|
                    |     === Testudines
                    |
                    ========= Archosauromorpha 

Finally, without turtles, ichthyosaurs were the sister-group of sauropterygians, and that clade was located outside Sauria (Sauria is identified with the wrong clade in Caldwell's figure).

     ===================== Araeoscelidia 
     |
=====|  ================== Claudiosaurus 
     |  |
     ===|  =============== Younginiformes 
        |  |
        ===|     ========= Ichthyosauria 
           |  ===|
           |  |  ========= Sauropterygia
           ===|
              |        === Lepidosauromorpha 
              ==Sauria=|
                       === Archosauromorpha 

Motani et al. (1998) reassessed the affinities of ichthyosaurs using the data matrices of Rieppel and deBraga (1996) and of Caldwell (1996) by adding ichthyosaurs (in the first case) or recoding them by incorporating data that they had recently obtained about the early (Lower Triassic) ichthyosaur Utatsusaurus hataii. Using the matrix of Rieppel and deBraga (1996), they obtained the following topology:

     ======================== Araeoscelidia 
     |
=====|  ===================== Claudiosaurus 
     |  |
     ===|  ================== Younginiformes 
        |  |
        ===|  =============== Ichthyosauria 
           |  |
           ===|           === Lepidosauria
              |        ===|
              ==Sauria=|  === Sauropterygia 
                       |
                       ====== Archosauromorpha 

In that tree, turtles (not shown) were located outside diapsids, in their traditional location (along with other parareptiles). According to that tree, ichthyosaurs are stem- diapsids, and sauropterygians are lepidosauromorphs.

Using the data matrix of Caldwell (1996), Motani et al. (1998) obtained the following topology:

     =========================== Araeoscelidia 
     |
=====|  ======================== Claudiosaurus
     |  |
     ===|  ===================== Younginiformes
        |  |
        ===|  ================== Ichthyosauria 
           |  |
           ===|           ====== Lepidosauria
              |        ===|
              |        |  |  === Testudines
              ==Sauria=|  ===|
                       |     === Sauropterygia
                       |
                       ========= Archosauromorpha 

In this tree, the position of ichthyosaurs and sauropterygians remains the same, but turtles move into lepidosauromorphs, as the sister-group of sauropterygians.

Finally, Merck (1997) suggests that ichthyosaurs are the sister-group of sauropterygians, and that this clade is part of Archosauromorpha.

The conflicting results obtained from various authors, and sometimes, by a single author (or group of authors) using different taxa suggest that more work is needed to assess the affinities of ichthyosaurs, sauropterygians, and turtles.

References

Benton M. J. 1985. Classification and phylogeny of the diapsid reptiles. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 84: 97-164.

deBraga M. and O. Rieppel. 1997. Reptile phylogeny and the interrelationships of turtles. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 120: 281-354.

Caldwell M. 1996. Ichthyosauria: a preliminary phylogenetic analysis of diapsid affinities. Neuen Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. Abhandlungen 200: 361-386.

Evans S. E. 1988. The early history and relationships of the Diapsida. In: M. J. Benton (ed.) The phylogeny and classification of the tetrapods: 221-260. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Gauthier J. A. 1994. The diversification of the amniotes. In: D. R. Prothero and R. M. Schoch (ed.) Major Features of Vertebrate Evolution: 129-159. Knoxville, Tennessee: The Paleontological Society.

Gauthier J., R. Estes, & K. de Queiroz. 1988a. A phylogenetic analysis of Lepidosauromorpha. In: R. Estes and G. Pregill (ed.) Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families: 15-98. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Laurin M. 1991. The osteology of a Lower Permian eosuchian from Texas and a review of diapsid phylogeny. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 101: 59-95.

Merck J. 1997. A phylogenetic analysis of the euryapsid reptiles. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 17: 65A.

Motani R., N. Minoura, and T. Ando. 1998. Ichthyosaurian relationships illuminated by new primitive skeletons from Japan. Nature 393: 255-257.

Rieppel O. 1993. Euryapsid relationships: A preliminary analysis. Neuen Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. Abhandlungen 188: 241-264.

Rieppel O. 1994. Osteology of Simosaurus gaillardoti and the relationships of stem-group sauropterygia. Fieldiana Geology 1462: 1-85.

Rieppel O. & M. deBraga. 1996. Turtles as diapsid reptiles. Nature 384: 453-455.

About This Page

Michel Laurin
Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France

Jacques A. Gauthier
Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Page: Tree of Life Diapsid Phylogeny Authored by Michel Laurin and Jacques A. Gauthier. The TEXT of this page is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License - Version 3.0. Note that images and other media featured on this page are each governed by their own license, and they may or may not be available for reuse. Click on an image or a media link to access the media data window, which provides the relevant licensing information. For the general terms and conditions of ToL material reuse and redistribution, please see the Tree of Life Copyright Policies.

close box

This page is a note that is attached to a branch of the Tree of Life.

ToL notes provide brief accounts of characteristics, short summaries, commentaries, media files, taxonomic information, or identification tools for a given group of organisms.

For a more detailed explanation of the different ToL page types, have a look at the Structure of the Tree of Life page.

close box

Diapsida

Page Content

articles & notes

collections

people

Explore Other Groups

random page

  go to the Tree of Life home page
top